References

  1. Paige, R.W., Roberts, J.D.M., Murray, L.R. and Mellor, D.W.: "Fracture Measurement Using Hydraulic Impedance Testing," SPE 24824, 1992.

  2. Paige, R.W., Murray, L.R. and Roberts, J.D.M.: "Field Application of Hydraulic Impedance Testing for Fracture Measurement," SPE 26525, 1993

  3. Holzhausen, G.R. and Egan, H.N.: "Fracture Diagnostics in East Texas and Western Colorado Using the Hydraulic Impedance Method," paper SPE 15215, presented at SPE 1986 Unconventional Gas Technology Symp., Louisville, KY (May 18-21).

  4. Wylie, E.B. and Streeter, V.L: Fluid Transients, FEB Press, Ann Arbor (1982) 384 pages.

  5. Holzhausen, G.R. and Gooch, R.P.: "Impedance of Hydraulic Fractures: Its Measurement and Use for Estimating Fracture Closure Pressure and Dimensions," SPE/DOE 13892, Denver, CO (May 1985).

  6. Simpson, A.J. and Paige, R.W.: "Advances in Forties Field Water Injection," SPE 23140, paper presented at the Offshore Europe Conference, Aberdeen, Scotland (September 3-6, 1991).

  7. Sneddon, I.N., "The Distribution of Stresses in the Region of a Crack in an Elastic Solid," Proceedings of Roy. Soc. A, (1946) 187-229.

  8. Clifford, P.J., Mellor, D.W. and Jones, T.J.: "Water Quality Requirements for Fractured Injection Wells," SPE 21439, paper presented at the SPE Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, (November 16-19, 1991).

  9. Paige, R.W. and Murray, L.R.: "Produced Water Re-Injection - Field Experience and Current Understanding," venue unknown.

<Advantages and Limitations Advantages and Limitations   Click to return to Advantages and Limitations.
 
  Best Practices> Best Practices   Click here to return to Best Practices - Available Field Methods.
 

Back to Key Issues Top Previous Monitoring Best Practices